editor decision started nature rejection editor decision started nature rejection

the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is Research suggests that . Thank you for visiting nature.com. [CDATA[> Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent . //-->Frontiers | Editors between Support and Control by the Digital The process was on par with other journal experiences, but I do not appreciate the inconsistency between what the editor at Nature Medicine told me when transferring to Nature Comms, and the final evaluation at Nature Comms. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. Should I write to the editor or wait for a response/change in status? Things just always take much longer than we think they would. What does editor decision started mean nature? Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. Depending on the journal, you may even be offered to resubmit the manuscript . However, if it has not gone through peer review, but is directly showing the status awaiting final decision, then there is a possibility that your paper might be rejected after initial screening by the editor. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. Answered by Editage Insights While editing corrects the structure of your article whereas a peer reviewer gives you an extensive analysis. I am at the same stage. and if it is not clarified on the . resubmitnoveltyappeal, Resubmitpoint-by-pointresponse letterresubmitresponse letterresubmitresponse letternature, Proofreadingresubmit, Proofreadinglicence to publish, NatureNatureNature, wileynature science, Nature CommunicationsNatureNature CommunicationsPeer-review, Nature Communicationstransparent peer-reviewgetNature Communicationsget50%Nature Communicaitons, sciencenature. Yes, its appropriate. //-->Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. Nature's subeditors are happy to advise authors about the format of their Articles after acceptance for publication. Improve this answer. The finals started yesterday. sciencenature - Rejections based on serious errors are frustrating for authors and damaging to the journal's credibility, and so we have a procedure for reconsidering decisions at the author's request. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. [1] Sovereignty entails hierarchy within the state, as well as external autonomy for states. They are, instead, rewarded non-financially by means of acknowledgment in journals, positions on editorial boards, free journal access, discounts on author fees, etc. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? My paper has been in that state for over a month, but the editor let us know it was going out for peer review. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. One perk, however, is having the choice and control over what I . ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision If both reviewers give negative recommendations, it is much less likely for the editor to accept a paper. Decisions, decisions | Nature Neuroscience Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? All peer-reviewed content will carry an anonymous statement of peer reviewer acknowledgement, and for those reviewers who give their consent, we will publish their names alongside the published article. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Hopefully, the exact situation will become clear with the next status update. Editor rejected manuscript claiming it is similar to a not-yet-published manuscript (that I haven't seen). Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. edit the language for maximum clarity and precision for those in other disciplines. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. PIs gone AWOL? [CDATA[// >